Why launch another mRNA vaccine??

Vaccination has always been presented as something so routine that questioning it can feel 'almost' stupidly inappropriate: you are expected to receive a whole schedule of vaccinations as soon as you’re born because you are told they are “necessary” to keep you healthy and prevent illnesses that never existed in the first place. 

Learn how to protect yourself from this new mRNA vaccine and its massive shedding. You have autonomy in health, and Ezra Healing is here to support it.

We are told vaccines “train” the immune system and protect us from serious diseases, and are on of the most important tools in modern medicine. But how often are we actually encouraged to ask what happens after that needle enters our body? 

What is exactly being injected? 

What does the immune system do with it? 

What are all the other ingredients doing? 

And what happens when the immune system reacts in a way that wasn’t intended?

Because each of us are unique, so how are we expected to even begin to consider a vaccination created for the masses?

The 2020’s jabs and the millions that were invested into their global marketing were a joke. They have already shown us that the high risk they put us under is not worth it – especially as tens of thousands of people are just now starting to see various auto-immune disorders, inexplicable illnesses, extreme fatigue (is it “long Covid” or “long jab? It's the "jab that keeps on giving!"), turbo cancers, and a whole potpourri of new dis-eases. 

So despite everything we’ve learned, why launch another mRNA vaccine? 

The answer: money. 

You and us all know it.

Pharmaceutical companies generated over $100 billion in total revenue and over $90 billion in pure net profits from the Covid vaccine during the peak of the pandemic. Vaccines are a money-making industry, and they are starting their testing on those aged 50+.

Why that demographic?

Because they consider them to statistically be the most "complacent".

They think they are the sandwich generation, who can more easily convince their kids to do it, and their ageing parents too.

Brilliant!

And pathetic.

The new mRNA flu shot the FDA has just approved in the US, is the latest biological weapon (because this is exactly what it is) directed to the 50+ population to experiment with. They try to reassure us, as they always do, that it “uses genetic instructions to prompt cells to build harmless viral proteins”, but what it really means is that through these vaccinations, scientists are injecting your body with a small piece of genetic code (which of course is marketed as “safe”), commanding your own cells to become viral protein factories for far longer than any previous vaccination. Essentially, it’s based on the Covid mRNA vaccinations but stronger on the health of our body – yet with much weaker results.

The mRNA technology

The FDA's newly approved mFlusiva, Moderna's first mRNA influenza vaccine, is the first mRNA-based flu vaccine (and probably not the last, because if you could previously convince over 5.6 billion people globally to take at least one shot, why not keep going?)

Unlike a traditional flu vaccine, which directly introduces influenza antigens into the body (still not making it acceptable), mFlusiva uses genetic instructions (called mRNA) to tell some of your own cells to “temporarily” produce influenza proteins. Your immune system then recognizes those proteins as foreign and develops an immune response to them. In simple terms, they suggest, instead of giving your immune system the finished "target", this technology gives your cells the instructions for making the target themselves.

The reason this technology is attractive to vaccine developers is speed of manufacture (profit) and flexibility for adjustment (profit). Influenza viruses continually change, and mRNA technology can potentially allow manufacturers to change the genetic sequence used in a vaccine more rapidly when a new strain becomes prevalent. This is being presented as an important advantage of the mRNA platform and as a way of responding more quickly to emerging respiratory viruses – which basically translates to: needing a new version of the flu jab every year.

But this is also part of the issue. 

mFlusiva is a new biological technology being introduced into the influenza vaccine market, and like any medical intervention, it is not without potential reactions or risks. In the clinical trial used to support its approval, common reactions were considerably more frequent with the mRNA vaccine than with the standard-dose flu vaccine: Injection-site pain occurred in approximately 66% of participants receiving the mRNA vaccine compared with 30% receiving the standard, previous flu vaccine. Fatigue occurred in 45% versus 20%, headache in 38% versus 18%, and muscle aches in 35% versus 12%. Most of these reactions were said to be “temporary and mild-to-moderate”, yet the difference between the two groups is nevertheless highly significant, depicting the body’s own, natural, healthy reaction to a foreign substance entering it. Keep in mind these reactions tell us body is clearly saying “no.”

In addition, for adults 65 and older, the FDA granted accelerated approval, meaning the approval was based primarily on the vaccine producing an immune response that regulators believe is “reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit”. And as a post-approval study is currently being required to confirm that clinical benefit, isn’t it more than fair to suggest this mRNA vaccine should not have even been approved?

This raises an important question that consumers have every right to ask: when we introduce a new technology into the body, how much demonstrated benefit is enough to justify the potential risks?

That question becomes particularly relevant when the new vaccine is being compared with an existing vaccine rather than to no vaccination at all, and when some of the evidence supporting its use in older adults is still being confirmed.

What happens after the injection?

The mRNA is meant to deliver a set of “temporary” instructions, and mFlusiva injection contains three types of mRNA, representing three influenza strains. The mRNA is packaged inside tiny lipid (oily) particles so it can enter the cells. Once the particles get into the cells: 

1. The mRNA provides instructions for making a particular influenza protein called hemagglutinin, of HA – which on its own is not a natural body process, let’s start there...
   

2. Your cell reads those instructions. The cell's normal protein-making machinery uses the mRNA as a template and produces the HA protein.
   

3. Your immune system sees the HA protein. The FDA describes the resulting HA proteins as being recognized by immune cells as foreign antigens. This stimulates an immune response, including massively boosted antibody production.
   

4. The mRNA is not "intended" to remain as a permanent instruction; its mission is to give cells temporary instructions to make a particular influenza protein; the mRNA itself it not the thing your immune system is ultimately supposed to develop immunity against – but how can we even be sure, since the mFlusiva (and other mRNA-derived vaccinations) have only been recently developed, on an accelerated trial basis? And why would anyone even trust a medical system that is clearly based on profit?
   

What about natural immunity?

The immune system has its own capacity to recognize pathogens, respond to them, and develop immune memory. Vaccination attempts to synthetically create immune memory without requiring the person to experience the full disease; but it’s not the same biological experience. Natural infection and vaccination expose the immune system to different stimuli, through different routes and under different circumstances; the issue becomes once a significant health change follows a vaccination, the synthetic stimuli has already entered your body – and will not be released – so it’s there with you, every day, as your body continues to shed to those around you, while it tries try to be rid of it.

Trial numbers

Let’s look at the trial numbers for a minute: 

The trial included 40,703 adults aged 50 and older.

There were:

• 411 cases out of 20,179 in the mRNA group – about 2.0%

• 557 cases out of 20,124 in the standard-vaccine group – about 2.8%

That produces the reported 26.6% relative vaccine “efficacy”. In Phase 3 of the trial, reactions were substantially more common with mRNA-1010 than with the standard-dose comparator:

reported reaction	mRNA vaccine	standard vaccine
injection-site pain	65.8%	29.8%
fatigue	45.1%	20.3%
headache	37.8%	18.0%
muscle aches	35.4%	11.6%

(Again, note that none of these studies compared natural immunity)

Serious adverse events occurred in 2.2% of mRNA recipients versus 1.9% of comparator recipients, which indicates there is considerably more reactogenicity in this new mRNA model (Reactogenicity is the body’s inflammatory response to the vaccine). It seems we are going backwards, rather than moving toward more natural and preventive care for the body…

Health Canada currently openly acknowledges myocarditis and pericarditis as rare reactions reported following several Covid mRNA vaccines. It also acknowledges the occurrence of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome following certain viral-vector Covid vaccines. This is an important lesson in how medicine is supposed to work – and despite the Trump administration cancelling $766 million in the Moderna bird flu contracts, citing safety and efficacy concerns, here we are, fast-tracking a new vaccine that is already showing us less effectiveness than its previously-ineffective non-mRNA counterpart.

This is depopulation at its best.

How you can protect yourself

At Ezra Healing, we suggest the number one thing you can do is prevent any vaccinations from entering your body and keeping your genetic code as natural and intact as it can possibly be. Decline all mRNA vaccinations and educate yourself and those around you to do the same. Preventing the flu is easier to manage than dealing with spike protein toxicity for days, months, and even years to come. Support your body by eating healthy, exercising regularly and supplementing as necessary as strategies to repair DNA. We can show you how.

Needless to say, and although we are supposed to refer to your family doctor for further information, we believe that prevention always comes first, and that everyone has the right to autonomy: making choices that fit your own values and goals rather than being forced by others. 

We are fully AWAKE. Are you?

Comment below with your thoughts.

Do you need help? Click here to talk.